The antics of the bureaucrats at the USA's National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) have hit the news - a whistleblower (recently retired senior scientist) has detailed the tortured process whereby a politically desirable "research" outcome was contrived and then the evidence of how it was done was destroyed before anybody could re-do / validate the arithmetic used....
I would though challenge the concept that this is NOAA data - it isn't actual "data" - as in actual measurement - it is an example of prejudiced and dishonest manipulation of readings designed to produce a "politically useful result" - and the dog ate the computer ... sheesh...
The obliging bureaucrats at NOAA have busied themselves churning a whole series of AGW confirmation pieces aimed at supporting the last administration's policies - some well founded but misrepresented - others completely fraudulent and contrived. All served to prop up policy initiatives which for the most part had bugger-all to do with saving the planet and a lot to do with ideological goals.
Here at Avoncliff North Mill we are inured to the antics of bureaucrats seeking to justify their wonkily contrived assertions in the service of their arbitrary self serving decisions - and I like to think we can spot BS quite accurately - not that much skill is required in this case - the sods just made it up.
There's one thing about congenital liars - they can't stop themselves.... There will be more embarrassing stuff leaking out related to fiddling the evidence for Climate Change and Global Warming. It's pretty clear that the folk involved should actually be thoroughly ashamed of themselves. A random commenter gives us - "Karl et al reached the required conclusions by the wrong methods"
Further reading at Dr Judith Curry's (School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology.) blog - HERE . Quite a lot of sparks and smoke and mirrors and things.... in the comments.
Apparently the G114-2.5 MW turbine on a 328-foot tower “creased” at the access door at ground level.- debris was spread over half a kilometre.
Scottish Power refused to answer specific questions on the incident or provide a photograph of the debris.
"The £300million Kilgallioch development has 96 mills and will generate 239 mega watts to power up to 130,000 homes when fully onstream later this year."
Hang on.... here we go again ... powering "up to" "xxxxxx homes" and slyly avoiding any suggestion that the windfarm doesn't produce power when there's no wind - that wind being adequate to turn the turbines a mere 26% of the time. - imagine if your light switches had a similar performance?
To add insult to injury in the weasel wording and evasiveness extends to torturing the measurement numbers for the quantity of electricity generated - which is measured in mega Watt hours (MWh) - NOT mega watts... The distance to London is not 70 mph.
In all - embarrassing and - a fairly full on deployment of complete BS about the efficacy of windmills.
oops! - there goes another one - BBC story - maybe the folk in 'Norn Iron have a slightly different view (something to do withe wood chips mebbe?) from the big offices on the mainland where they copy n paste press releases from renewables lobby groups? Time to send in the ideological rectitude Inquisition.
There are likely many that would view the restructuring and re-purposing of The Environmental Protection Agency as some act of vandalism by a new US administration, We have seen decades of increasing politicisation , corruption and legislative over-reach which have little if anything to do with "protecting the environment".
I don't particularly care to copy 'n paste other people's stuff so - two links to articles at Watts Up With That (WUWT)